Hazem Naow vs David Poljak Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Naow vs Poljak analysis and find out who is favored!
Hazem Naow vs David Poljak Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Naow 1 - 0 Poljak
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Naow has won 49.4% of points on his second serve, while Poljak has won 49.74%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Naow, in recent form, has won 56.85% of his opponent's second serve points, while Poljak has won 50.75%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.17% and 28.94% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Naow has saved 62.6% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Poljak has saved 62.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Naow has won 69.14% of matches played (W/L 56/ 25), with Poljak winning 39.53% (W/L 17/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Naow has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 71% (W/L 65/ 27), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 55/ 38). Poljak has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 103/ 72), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 104/ 108).
- Player level: In the last year, Naow has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 73.08% of matches (W/L 38/ 14), where as Poljak has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 39.39% of matches (W/L 13/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Naow winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Naow winning 2 and Poljak winning 0. The last match between Naow and Poljak was at the M25 Nussloch, 25-01-2024, Second, Carpet with Hazem Naow getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:38:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Naow and Poljak have played a deciding set 0 times, with Naow winning 0 times and Poljak 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Naow winning 0, and Poljak 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Naow has played against opponents with an average rank of 181.72 while Poljak has played against players with an average rank of 163.74.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Naow has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Poljak has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Naow has converted 43.95% of breakpoint opportunities, and Poljak has converted 34.09% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
4
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
343
Rank
323
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
897
Rank
370
High
28
Age
R
Plays
6
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
6
Minor
Form
66% (152-80)
Career Total W/L
54% (306-258)
73% (27-10)
YTD W/L
42% (8-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Hazem Naow | David Poljak |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 8 |
Aces (Total) | 5 | 8 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 1:38:0 | 1:38:0 |
1st Serve % | 72% (48/67) | 70% (49/70) |
1st Serve Win% | 75% (36/48) | 73% (36/49) |
2nd Serve Win% | 37% (7/19) | 29% (6/21) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (3/9) | 25% (1/4) |
Return Points W% | 40% (28/70) | 36% (24/67) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-4 |
Hazem Naow
Player
David Poljak
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
5
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
66
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Hazem Naow | David Poljak |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 73% (27/10) | 42% (8/11) |
Sets Win/Loss | 67% (56/27) | 43% (19/25) |
Games Win/Loss | 56% (424/337) | 50% (228/225) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 67% (8/4) | 0% (0/1) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 76% (19/6) | 38% (5/8) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.57 |
Aces Total | 77 | 125 |
DFs per game | 0.36 | 0.18 |
DFs Total | 133 | 40 |
Avg Match Time | 1:37:3 | 1:47:56 |
Avg Opp Rank | 250.19 | 159.53 |
1st Serve % | 63% (1595/2525) | 61% (907/1482) |
1st Serve W% | 69% (1105/1595) | 72% (655/907) |
2nd Serve W% | 49% (456/930) | 50% (286/575) |
BPs Won% Total | 43% (126/290) | 34% (45/132) |
Return Pts W% | 43% (1067/2489) | 37% (536/1451) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 71% (15/6) | 25% (1/3) |
Futures W/L | 80% (12/3) | 47% (7/8) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 73% (27/37) | 42% (8/19) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 33% (3/9) |
Deciding Set W% | 78% (7/9) | 50% (3/6) |
1st set W, W | 100% (23/23) | 71% (7/5) |
1st set W, L | 0% (23/0) | 29% (7/2) |
1st set L, W | 29% (14/4) | 25% (12/3) |
Hazem Naow Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Hazem Naow
95%
(
54 of
57)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
85%
(
52 of
61)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Hazem Naow
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Henri Squire
Player
Hazem Naow
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Hazem Naow
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Mae Malige
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
36%
(
15 of
42)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Dario Huber
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
95)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
42)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Gregoire Barrere
Player
Hazem Naow
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
74%
(
32 of
43)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
50
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Michael Geerts
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
8
Aces
11
7
Double Faults
2
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
46 of
64)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
33%
(
35 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
97)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Hazem Naow
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more
David Poljak Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Robert Strombachs
Player
David Poljak
64%
(
75 of
118)
1st Serve %
67%
(
72 of
107)
2
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
4
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
35%
(
15 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
46%
(
54 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
107)
112
Total Points Won
113
|
7-6(5) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matej Vocel
Player
David Poljak
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
11
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
41 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
David Poljak
Player
James Watt
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
81%
(
55 of
68)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
David Poljak
Player
Nikita Ianin
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
15 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Nikita Ianin
Player
David Poljak
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
17 of
52)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
David Poljak
Player
Joe Tyler
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
David Poljak
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alex Knaff
Player
David Poljak
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Lucas Poullain
Player
David Poljak
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
104)
1
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
1
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
David Poljak
Player
Stijn Pel
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H |
view more